data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27c10/27c103d5fe0625d2d5d017c6914020056e1f8cb2" alt=""
So what of it then? Well, dating from 1929, 'Tears' is a classic old school crooner's song from a time when females weren't 'babes' and love was handled with the same formal respect ("Tears have been my only consolation, but tears can't mend a broken heart I must confess") that Dodd shows this. There's no trace of his comedian 'day job' in his treatment - he means it man and though Dodd is a competent singer, his fussy and quite prissy diction ensures the upper lip is kept stiff enough not to let any genuine emotion show either way. It makes 'Tears' a bit like turkey without the cranberry sauce - perfectly edible by itself, but rather dry, tasteless and not something you'd care to have too much of.
*I can't leave it lie there though - nestled in with The Beatles and The Stones, 'Tears' looks and sounds like a song out of time, almost as if it slipped through a wormhole from a much earlier decade by mistake and was frantically looking for a way back. And yet this was the biggest selling single of 1965 (and the third biggest selling of the entire decade), outselling stone cold classics like ''Mr Tambourine Man', '(I Can't Get No) Satisfaction' and 'You've Lost That Loving Feelin'' - it begs - nay, demands - the question 'why'? Why should such an unremarkable song from an unremarkable singer make such an impact in an era of unprecedented musical development and change? Did Scouser Dodd catch a wave via a heavy marketing campaign as the 'original Merseysound'? Was it an orchestrated backlash from the previous generation looking to put the brakes on the social upheavals exploding around them by finding an anchor to the past? And what did those sixties stars think when their studio innovations were trumped by a jobbing singer with a thirty year old tune? I don't know, I don't know, I don't know and I don't know. There are no answers yet 'Tears' remains, a song as out of time now as it was in 1965.
No comments:
Post a Comment